RAS PresidiumДоклады Российской академии наук. Науки о жизни Doklady Biological Sciences

  • ISSN (Print) 2686-7389
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5057

Expression Level of Carotenoid Biosynthesis Genes in Leaves Is Associated With Cold Tolerance of Zea Mays L. Plants

PII
S30345057S2686738925040133-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034505725040133
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 523 / Issue number 1
Pages
457-461
Abstract
The expression profile of key carotenoid biosynthesis genes (ZmPSY1, ZmPSY2, ZmLcyE) was determined in the dynamics of cold stress and post-stress recovery in the leaves of Zea mays L. plants of four cold-resistant (breeders' data) inbred lines: L‑5580-1, L‑6097-1, L‑5254-3 and L‑5272-6. It has been shown that under normal growing conditions the expression level of all three genes in the L‑5580-1 line is significantly higher compared to other lines. It was revealed that low-temperature exposure affects the trends of gene expression fluctuations in a similar way between the lines. It was determined that in the dynamics of stress, the leaves of L‑5580-1 plants are characterized by coordination of the co-expression pattern of the ZmPSY1 and ZmPSY2 genes with changes in the carotenoid content.
Keywords
Zea mays L. холодовой стресс биосинтез каротиноидов фитоинсинат лизин-ɛ- циклаза экспрессия генов
Date of publication
15.06.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
66

References

  1. 1. Waadt R., Seller C.A., Hsu P.K., et al. // Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022. V. 23(10). P. 680–694.
  2. 2. Kidokoro S., Shinozaki K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. // Trends Plant Sci. 2022. V. 27(9). P. 922–935.
  3. 3. Matsuoka Y., Vigouroux Y., Goodman M.M., et al. // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002. V. 99. P. 6080–6084.
  4. 4. Afrouz M., Sayyed R.Z., Fazeli-Nasab B., et al. // Peer J. 2023. V. 11. P. e15644.
  5. 5. Soualiou S., Duan F., Li X., et al. // J. Exp. Bot. 2023. V. 74(10). P. 3142–3162.
  6. 6. Ma H., Liu C., Li Z., et al. // Plant Physiol. 2018. V. 178(2). P. 753–770.
  7. 7. Waititu J.K., Cai Q., Sun Y., et al. // Genes (Basel). 2021. V. 12(10). P. 1638.
  8. 8. Rosas-Saavedra C., Stange C. // Subcell. Biochem. 2016. V. 79. P. 35–69.
  9. 9. Zunjare R.U., Hossain F., Muthusamy V., et al. // Front. Plant Sci. 2018. V. 9. P. 178.
  10. 10. Gallagher C.E., Matthews P.D., Li F., et al. // Plant Physiol. 2004. V. 135. P. 1776–1783.
  11. 11. Li F., Vallabhaneni R., Wurtzel E.T. // Plant Physiol. 2008. V. 146(3). P. 1333–1345.
  12. 12. Li F., Vallabhaneni R., Yu J., et al. // Plant Physiol. 2008. V. 147(3). P. 1334–1346.
  13. 13. Efremov G.I., Slugina M.A., Shchennikova A.V., et al. // Plants. 2020. V. 9(9). P. 1169.
  14. 14. Bonnecarrère V., Borsani O., Díaz P., et al. // Plant Sci. 2011. V. 180(5). P. 726–732.
QR
Translate

Indexing

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library